![]() Still, the question remains regarding filmmakers and their future involvement in 3D (and perhaps 4D) cinema going forward: Is this a new future or a last stand?Īnd, truthfully, this question doesn’t appear to have a definitive answer. What Filmmakers Should Look Forward To Image via IMDb. These effects include simulations like motion, vibration, scent, temperature changes, strobes, and other effects, such as mist, rain, bubbles, and fog, which can all add to the experience.Īlong with 3D IMAX and Dolby 3D offerings this summer, big current and upcoming blockbusters like Top Gun: Maverick, Oppenheimer, Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One, Avatar: The Way of Water, and Jurassic World Dominion are set to release at motion-enhanced 4D theaters, as well. Not only are digital cameras becoming smarter, faster, and more powerful, but technology is also advancing in terms of rendering, display, and audio quality, as filmmakers and studios are working to reinvent how the theatrical experience can be enjoyed.ĤD film is a new high-tech system that has combined traditional 3D elements with physical effects (the 4th dimension in the name), which can be experienced in your theater seat. Technology has advanced rapidly in the past few years-in numerous ways-in the film industry. Yet, even at the time, while audiences delighted in many of the more significant titles and saw their favorite stars in three dimensions, critics were quick to note that while the technology was fun, its overall effect was not always at service to the story-in fact, often used unnecessarily and quite poorly.Īs such, the 3D format became nearly synonymous with other cinema gimmicks to bring audiences a quick experience, yet offering little else in terms of quality cinema and filmmaking. To many modern audiences who can remember back to this period in the ’80s and ’90s, this could be considered the contemporary heyday of 3D cinema, as theaters across the globe began to install IMAX projectors and lean heavily into the marketing behind big-budget titles like Terminator (with its T2 3-D: Battle Across Time film). However, despite some early success with audiences due to the spectacle of 3D, the format really didn’t find mainstream popularity again until the mid-1980s, when Disney began to utilize the IMAX both for non-fiction documentary and educational purposes, as well as for entertainment with notable films like Magic Journeys, Captain EO, and experiential films like Jim Henson’s Muppet*Vision 3D and Honey, I Shrunk the Audience. These films paint a perfect example of how Hollywood used and marketed 3D cinema as a way to draw audiences in to see larger-than-life spectacle-focused features.ģD Movies Over the Years Image via Disney. Gunzberg, there were numerous 3D films in the early 1950s, with titles like The Lions of Gulu, House of Wax, and It Came from Outer Space. Using the “Natural Vision” process developed by M. Which, arguably to those without a deep cinema knowledge, is way earlier than one might think. ![]() However, while there were numerous 3D iterations like the phénakisticope, the stereoscope, and the Stereophoroskop, 3D cinema, as we know it today, didn’t really develop its roots until the 1950s. ![]() In researching the history of 3D cinema, one might be surprised to learn that the earliest iterations of three-dimensional film can be traced back to as early as the 1830s-making it pretty much as old as film itself. ![]() Or, maybe 3D is ready to move on to something else? However, as cinemas reopen and we gear up for a potentially historic blockbuster summer, 3D films are here again to entice audiences with their multi-dimensional antics.Īnd, for aspiring filmmakers and film fans alike, these next few months should be an interesting case study into whether or not 3D films are back in full force-or if this 3D format is finally ready to die. And, overall, it was just overwhelming to watch and made me really never want to see a film in 3D again.Īnd, while this might be a personal anecdote and opinion, I certainly wasn’t alone as the film went on to be a flop at the box office and is, in part-along with several other 3D films of this mid-2000s era-one of the reasons that 3D movies fell off after this period. The characters’ faces just seemed to jut off the screen at odd angles. To me, even at the time, it felt like it encapsulated everything wrong with the 3D cinema experience as the film felt off. While the film did receive some critical acclaim, it might be one of the most notorious examples of unnecessary use of 3D CGI (that could never quite find its way out of the uncanny valley.) While it wasn’t quite the high water mark for cinema entertainment or great filmmaking in general, I still vividly remember seeing Robert Zemeckis‘ Beowulf at an IMAX theater back in 2007. Are audiences ready for another 3D boom? Or is this the end of the 3D film experience as we know it? Let’s discuss.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |